How RegTech Has Transformed Financial Institutions in the Last Decade
The financial industry is undergoing a tremendous transition due to technological upgrades and changing consumer expectations. Especially, consumer protection and market integrity requirements are driving this change.
This complex regulatory environment presents challenges for financial organisations. Yet, RegTech can fix this, streamlining compliance, mitigating risks, and improving operational efficiency by utilising data, AI, and automation.
Digital transformation is a vital enabler, allowing financial institutions to modernise operations, improve data management, and strengthen regulatory compliance. Let us go deeper into the realm of RegTech, investigating its benefits, problems, and disruptive impact on the financial sector.
Rise of RegTech
RegTech came into existence as a direct response to the voluminous complexity of regulatory compliance in the financial industry. Strict measures were enacted after the 2008 financial crisis to prevent a recurrence. While these regulations were essential, they burden financial institutions by requiring significant resources, time, and expertise to navigate.
The conventional, manual means of compliance have become increasingly ineffective. The sheer volume of data, the complexities of rules, and the growing risk of noncompliance formed a perfect storm. Therefore, RegTech remains ‘promising’ to financial firms that are struggling to stay up with the regulatory landscape.
Key Advantages of RegTech
RegTech has revolutionised how financial institutions approach compliance. Its benefits are far-reaching and significant.
Enhanced Efficiency and Productivity:
RegTech automates typical compliance operations like collecting data, reporting, and monitoring. This frees up staff for strategic planning and risk assessment. RegTech boosts operational efficiency by optimising operations and decreasing manual errors.
Reduced Operational Costs:
RegTech assists financial institutions in realising considerable cost savings by automating tasks, optimising resource allocation and reducing the risk of regulatory penalties.
Better Risk Management:
RegTech leverages machine learning and advanced analytics to accurately identify and assess threats, enabling financial institutions to safeguard profitability by proactively mitigating risks.
Enhanced Customer Experience:
RegTech streamlines customer onboarding and account opening processes, reducing wait times and improving satisfaction. Its enhanced security and fraud prevention capabilities also contributes to better consumer experience.
Strengthened Compliance Posture:
RegTech dramatically minimises the risk of regulatory breaches by automating compliance checks, tracking regulatory changes, and producing accurate regulatory reporting. A robust compliance posture protects the institution from penalties and boosts its credibility.
RegTech's Role in Compliance Management
Regulatory Monitoring and Interpretation
- RegTech solutions provide real-time updates on regulatory changes, ensuring financial institutions stay informed about evolving requirements.
- Advanced analytics and natural language processing capabilities enable the interpretation of complex regulations, translating them into actionable compliance measures.
Data Management and Quality
- Effective compliance hinges on accurate and complete data. RegTech solutions centralise data, improve data quality, and ensure data consistency across systems.
- Data governance frameworks are established to maintain data integrity and protect sensitive information.
Risk Assessment and Mitigation
- RegTech empowers financial institutions to identify, assess, and prioritise risks effectively.
- Advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms can detect patterns of suspicious activities, helping to mitigate risks such as fraud, money laundering, and market abuse.
Compliance Workflow Automation
- Routine compliance tasks, including data collection, reporting, and reconciliation, are automated, reducing manual effort and errors.
- Workflow optimisation ensures efficient execution of compliance processes.
Reporting and Disclosure
- RegTech solutions facilitate the generation of accurate and timely regulatory reports
- Data aggregation and validation capabilities improve report quality and reduce the risk of errors.
Audit and Supervision
- RegTech provides tools for internal and external auditors to efficiently assess compliance status.
- Real-time monitoring and reporting capabilities support regulatory supervision.
Specific Applications of RegTech in Compliance
Know Your Customer (KYC) and Customer Due Diligence (CDD)
RegTech solutions automate customer onboarding, identity verification, and due diligence checks.
Anti-Money Laundering (AML)
RegTech helps in transaction monitoring, suspicious activity reporting (SAR), and customer risk profiling.
Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF)
RegTech solutions support CTF compliance by screening customers against terrorist lists and monitoring high-risk transactions.
Data Privacy and Protection
- RegTech helps organisations comply with data privacy regulations.
- Data masking and encryption protect sensitive customer information.
- Data breach detection and response capabilities are enhanced.
Financial Reporting
- RegTech streamlines the collection, calculation, and submission of regulatory reports.
- Data quality checks and validation ensure accurate reporting.
- Automation reduces the risk of errors and delays.
Macro Global: The Perfect RegTech Partner
Macro Global is a leading RegTech provider, offering a comprehensive suite of solutions engineered to facilitate regulatory compliance for financial institutions.
The core RegTech offerings by Macro Global include SCV Forza, SCV Alliance, and CRS Stride. These solutions are specifically designed to address the challenges faced by financial institutions in streamlining and automating regulatory reporting requirements. These solutions seamlessly integrate with existing core banking systems and are compliant with ISO and other regulatory standards.
- Designed for financial institutions to meet regulatory demands efficiently.
- Provides simplified and streamlined regulatory operations, end-to-end, through functionalities such as data aggregation, data quality, and data privacy & compliance.
- Ensures data quality through multi-level data validations
- Utilises AI-based fuzzy logic to prevent data duplication
- Ensure the accuracy of SCV reports for FSCS submission.
- Designed for effortless and error-free electronic submissions to RegData, ensuring that financial institutions can effectively meet compliance requirements.
- Incorporates 175 comprehensive checkpoints to track and report potential high and medium-risk data issues effectively.
- Employs complex algorithms and external data sets to run data validation rules and generate accurate reports that fulfill FSCS regulatory compliance requirements
- Reduced compliance risks, significant efficiency gains, and shortened FSCS SCV reporting time by 30%.
- Facilitates retaining “Green Status Adherence” with the PRA for banks, building societies, credit unions, and other financial institutions.
- 90+ rigorous audit validations, and automated self-certification for end-to-end control of HMRC CRS & FATCA reporting
- Greater compliance and regulatory reporting workflow.
- Saves 85% of processing time and ensures data accuracy.
- Offers extended ad-hoc support for Void & variation submission
- Addresses challenges related to accurate processing with near-zero error.
- Consistent regulatory compliance framework.
- Adherence to the latest data protection and privacy standards
By partnering with Macro Global, financial institutions can confidently navigate the complex regulatory landscape while achieving operational excellence.
Contact Macro Global now to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements!
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Stay Ahead with Financial Regulatory Compliance Consulting Services
A Regulatory Compliance Consulting Service is your compass and guide in a dynamic financial regulatory environment, including strict enforcement, new regulations, and intensifying scrutiny. Taking advantage of the expertise of industry professionals, the consultancy assists financial institutions in navigating the intricacies of regulatory requirements to meet obligations and achieve operational excellence.
Consulting firms help financial institutions identify risks, create robust compliance programmes, and implement effective strategies to comply with legislation.
Decoding the Maze: The Role of Financial Regulatory Consultants
Think of a complex network of regulations, each with its distinct interpretations and nuances. Regulatory compliance consultants serve as competent facilitators, providing organisations with numerous benefits:
Gap Analysis and Risk Assessments: Consultants meticulously evaluate the FI’s operations to pinpoint potential regulatory compliance areas. Subsequently, they evaluate the current compliance programme of the organisation, emphasising potential deficiencies and opportunities for enhancement.
Strategy Development and Implementation: Consultants collaborate with the key stakeholders of the financial institutions to create a comprehensive compliance plan backed up by the risk assessment. This initiative outlines concise regulations, procedures, and training protocols to ensure regulatory compliance throughout the organisation.
Regulatory Updates and Monitoring: As the regulatory environment is forever evolving, the consultants stay aware of the latest developments and guide how to modify the compliance program eventually. Besides, they can monitor the compliance efforts to identify and resolve issues before they worsen.
Training and Awareness: Consultants create and deliver customised training programmes for the staff, ensuring that staff members at all levels are mindful of their roles and responsibilities in upholding compliance.
The GRC Framework: Cornerstone of Regulatory Compliance
Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) is the most vital concept in Regulatory Compliance. This comprehensive framework establishes the groundwork for a sustainable and resilient strategy for satisfying regulatory requirements.
Let us explore GRC’s three pillars and how a regulatory compliance consulting services can assist a financial institution to develop and execute a successful programme:
Governance: Setting the Direction
- Defining Objectives and Processes: A regulatory consulting service may help you define your organisation’s goals, establish processes, and identify silos that hamper communication and collaboration. This clarity is essential for creating a compliance strategy.
Risk Management: Proactive Protection
- Risk Identification and Mitigation: The consulting partner will collaborate with the financial institution to identify and mitigate potential operational, financial, and technological risks that could impede regulatory compliance efforts. They can then help the FI build risk mitigation plans to keep ahead of challenges.
Compliance: Meeting Obligations
- Collaboration in Implementation: The establishment of a GRC programme necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. Consultants can assist different departments work together, improving communication, and making sure everyone is on the same page with compliance objectives.
Beyond the Framework: Nuances addressed
Compliance isn’t merely about checking boxes, and a good consulting service knows that. It also includes the human element:
- “Hard” and “Soft” Concerns: Regulatory Consultants are aware of the necessity of tackling both the “softer” people concern, such encouraging a culture of compliance and ongoing learning, and the “hard” logistical parts of executing a GRC programme, like choosing and implementing a GRC platform.
Customised Solutions and Continuous Assistance
- Customisation and Scalability: Your Regulatory compliance consulting partner can help you customise and scale a GRC platform to satisfy your specific requirements, ensuring that it advances in tandem with your organisation.
- Gap Analysis and Roadmap: They can identify shortcomings in your current practices and craft a clear roadmap to compliance.
- Internal Controls and Audits: It is critical to set up efficient internal audit protocols and compliance requirements. Consultants can help you implement the right measures for the financial institutions.
Establishing a Compliance Culture
A culture of continuous development within the organisation is ultimately fostered by a successful GRC programme. Regulatory Compliance Consulting Services can assist you in accomplishing this by:
- Clarity of Roles and Responsibilities: Consultants can help establish distinct roles and responsibilities for compliance within your organisation, ensuring that everyone realises their role.
- Continuous Learning Environment: By encouraging a culture where compliance is seen as an ingrained value rather than merely a box-checking exercise, they may also push for continual training and education.
By adopting the GRC framework and collaborating with a seasoned consulting service, FIs can confidently navigate the constantly evolving regulatory environment, ensuring that your organisation thrives and complies with all relevant regulations.
Prudential Regulation Authority and Maintaining Financial Regulatory Compliance
The PRA is the primary regulator of UK financial institutions. Its primary objective is to strengthen financial institutions’ security and stability by maintaining adequate capital reserves, competent risk management, and effective governance. Furthermore, the PRA safeguards policyholders by standing up for customers and making sure insurance companies honour their duties.
PRA’s Enforcement Mechanism
- Sets detailed rulebooks that outline regulatory obligations for financial institutions.
- Regularly conducts on-site and off-site inspections to ensure financial regulatory compliance.
- Requires firms to submit detailed financial health and risk management reports.
- Involves enforcement actions like fines, business activity restrictions, or license suspensions for non-compliance.
- Given the PRA’s critical function and broad enforcement features, financial institutions in the UK must ensure compliance with its standards. Regulatory Compliance Consulting Services can truly help:
Understanding the Landscape: Consultants can offer detailed assistance with the most recent PRA rules and regulations, ensuring your financial institution is informed of its compliance obligations. They can analyse the current procedures and find areas where PRA compliance is lacking.
Developing a Compliance Strategy: Consultants can assist you in creating a bespoke regulatory compliance strategy that addresses identified weaknesses and assures continuing adherence to PRA laws.
Reporting and Recordkeeping: It is essential to maintain comprehensive and precise records to demonstrate compliance. Consulting helps build solid reporting and recordkeeping methods.
Risk Management Strategy:
Anticipating and minimising PRA enforcement issues requires an effective risk management strategy. Consultancy services can assist you in establishing such a framework.Liaison and Communication: Consultants can help you communicate with the PRA straightforwardly and transparently about your compliance activities.
A Regulatory Compliance Consulting Service gives you specialised experience to traverse the PRA’s regulatory landscape confidently. This preemptive approach reduces enforcement risk, protecting your institution’s finances and image.
The Digital Age of Compliance: The Technology Takeover
Technology is transforming regulatory compliance in various means. AI, at the centre of this change, helps organisations simplify processes, improve accuracy, and acquire a competitive edge.
The following are some major trends:
Automation: By automating repetitive duties such as data collection, document review, and reporting, valuable human resources can be allocated to more strategic analysis.
Data Analytics: Advanced analytics enable real-time monitoring of massive databases to identify and mitigate regulatory compliance concerns.
Cloud-Based Solutions: Cloud computing provides secure storage for regulatory documents, enables collaboration among teams, and guarantees accessibility from any location.
AI: The Powerhouse of Compliance
Among these technical breakthroughs, AI emerges as a transformational force. AI-powered systems can analyse massive datasets to anticipate potential regulatory infractions before they occur.
FSCS SCV Regulatory Platforms: AI-Based Functionalities
- Multi-level Data Validation: AI with fuzzy logic ensures data accuracy.
- Data Cleansing and Enrichment: AI algorithms identify and rectify data errors and inconsistencies.
- Improved Data Matching: AI handles complex matching tasks to link member data across systems.
- Automated Reporting: AI streamlines report generation by automating data extraction, transformation, and loading processes. AI can also automate document reviews and reporting, saving time and money for compliance.
- Future-Proofing Data Management: AI’s adaptability ensures long-term compliance with evolving regulations and data formats.
Machine learning algorithms can detect patterns in regulatory changes, allowing businesses to plan ahead of time and alter their compliance programmes.
AI-Powered Compliance Benefits
- Enhanced efficiency
- Improved accuracy and minimised human error
- Proactive risk management
- Monitor regulatory changes in real-time
- Swift compliance program adaptation.
- Data-driven decision making
How Macro Global Streamlines FI’s Path to Regulatory Compliance
To assist organisations in the financial services industry with the challenging task of regulatory compliance, Macro Global provides a full range of regulatory consulting services. Their process begins with a thorough evaluation of the company’s risk profile, IT infrastructure, and compliance framework; afterward, they provide a tailored plan to reach and stay in compliance. As regulations change, they make sure the compliance programme stays successful by offering expert guidance, integrating new technologies, and keeping an eye on it all the time.
Ensuring FSCS and CRS Compliance for Financial Institutions
Macro Global is a frontrunner in ensuring compliance with specific regulations like the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) and the Common Reporting Standard (CRS).
- FSCS Compliance: We offer a suite of Single Customer View (SCV) products, including SCV Forza and SCV Alliance, to help you streamline data management and generate accurate reports efficiently. These solutions ensure you meet the reporting requirements of the FSCS.
- CRS Compliance: Our CRS tools, like CRS Stride, provide a comprehensive solution for automatic data collection, validation, and reporting, ensuring seamless adherence to the CRS and similar international regulations.
While the specific solutions for FSCS and CRS compliance are highlighted, Macro Global offers a wide range of Financial Regulatory Compliance Consulting Services. These services encompass:
- Regulatory Risk Assessments and Gap Analysis
- Compliance Program Development and Implementation
- Data Governance and Management
- Regulatory Training and Awareness Programs
- Internal Audit and Monitoring
- Selection and Implementation of GRC Platforms
Partner with Macro Global and achieve regulatory compliance with confidence, transforming it from a burden to a strategic advantage.
Schedule a consultation with Macro Global today and ensure your regulatory compliance success!
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Selecting the Right Regulatory Compliance Companies: A Guide for Financial Institutions
Trust and stability are essential components of the financial sector; however, conserving this trust necessitates strict compliance with numerous regulations. Staying in line with regulations, such as anti-money laundering regulations and data security measures is always challenging for financial institutions. Financial institutions and the financial system are safeguarded by regulatory compliance corporations.
Robust compliance reporting, such as the FSCS reporting promotes transparency, reduces financial crime risk, protects consumers, and strengthens the financial sector’s health and stability; HMRC, the UK’s HM Revenue & Customs, is a key player in promoting Common Reporting Standard (CRS) compliance, a global agreement for automatic tax exchange. It collects CRS data from UK financial institutions, which are then transmitted to home tax authorities, thereby combating tax evasion.
Navigating the Challenge Landscape: Common Obstacles Faced by Firms
Financial institutions need to comply with such regulations, but managing their intricacy feels like a constant uphill battle. Firms frequently encounter the following challenges:
Maintaining Technological Progress
New technologies, like blockchain and AI, are dominating the financial industry at a rapid pace. These developments possess significant potential; yet they also introduce novel compliance requirements. Outdated regulatory compliance solutions may not have the flexibility to adapt to these nuances. Therefore, regulatory reporting software needs to be constantly updated to accommodate these evolving technologies which require robust data governance and clear audit trails to ensure compliance with data privacy regulations.
Coping with Changing Regulations
The rules and reporting requirements of regulatory bodies are perpetually revised. These changes can be rapid and demanding, necessitating that financial institutions demonstrate agility. To ensure that existing workflows are not disrupted, a compliance solution must be adaptable and capable of quickly incorporating new regulations and updates. The ideal compliance partner should have a dedicated team that actively monitors regulatory developments and ensures the systems comply with the most recent guidelines.
Dealing with Financial Crimes
For financial crimes like money laundering and the terrorist funding, financial institutions are easy prey. Firms must be capable of managing these hazards through regulatory solutions that are sufficiently resilient with features like
- Enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk customers,
- Transaction monitoring to detect suspicious activity,
- Effective sanctions screening.
An effective compliance system that identifies and reduces financial crime risks helps institutions satisfy regulatory requirements and safeguard FI’s reputation.
Ensuring Ecosystem Compliance with Regulatory Solutions Offering Companies
For a variety of services, financial institutions depend on a network of third-party vendors. However, these vendors pose compliance issues. Consider outsourcing your IT infrastructure to a third party. You must now ensure their systems and processes meet data security regulations. Effective compliance necessitates robust Vendor Risk Management (VRM) procedures. A regulatory compliance system with VRM capabilities lets you analyse vendor risk, monitor compliance performance, and hold them accountable for meeting standards.
Limited Resources and Compliance with Business Priorities
Compliance requires specialised training, dedicated staff, and process maintenance. This could put a load on an organisation’s resources while diverting them away from their main business tasks. Leveraging the expertise and technology of a reputable regulatory compliance company is a viable gain. This frees up internal resources for product development and customer service.
Choosing the Right Compliance Partner
Building Your Fortress of Compliance Selecting the right regulatory compliance partner goes beyond simply automating reports. Here’s a roadmap to guide you in choosing the ideal partner to fortify your compliance posture:
Deep Industry Expertise
Choose a regulatory compliance company that is aware of your sector’s nuances. Significant experience in financial institution services, particularly in the context of regulations such as FSCS and CRS reporting, is essential. They should be well-versed in the distinctive obstacles you encounter and provide customised solutions that seamlessly integrate with your current procedures.
Comprehensive Compliance Solutions Suite
The use of one general approach is ineffective in the present scenario. Select a regulatory compliance company that provides a comprehensive array of solutions to meet your entire compliance requirements. This could involve tools for collecting data, features for automatic report creation, risk management modules, and training programmes for employees. Search for a provider that can modify their solutions to meet your unique requirements and regulatory environment.
Automation Powerhouse
As it is time-consuming, laborious, and prone to errors to conduct manual data collection and report generation, an automated system that streamlines these procedures is essential for a compliance partner of exceptional quality. Automated tools retrieve essential data from the systems with accuracy and completeness.
Built-in validation checks detect and highlight inconsistencies before submission, acting as a safety net FI staff’s time and resources. The automation process cleanses raw data to standardise it in the required format and meet reporting criteria. Automation not only conserves valuable resources but also reduces the likelihood of errors, thus ensuring precise and timely regulatory reporting.
Always Ahead of the Regulatory Curve
As regulatory environments are frequently changing, establish a partnership with a regulatory compliance company that remains informed about these developments. They are expected to proactively monitor regulatory updates and convert them into actionable insights for your compliance team. As a result, you are consistently equipped to modify your procedures to satisfy the most recent specifications.
A Data Security Fortress
Financial data is exceptionally sensitive. The right regulatory compliance company should maintain industry-leading data security protocols such as robust encryption protocols, access controls, multi-level authentication, and regular security audits. They must exhibit a dedication to securing your data and reducing the risk of cyber-attacks.
Scalability and Adaptability
All financial institutions are diverse in terms of their size and complexity. Decide on a compliance partner that provides a solution capable of accommodating your unique requirements. Seek a platform that can adapt to the changing needs and volume of data as your institution expands, without jeopardising user experience or performance.
Consistent Customer Service
Assistance is necessary even for the most apparent solutions. Success necessitates ongoing assistance and seamless implementation. Consider collaborating with the ideal regulatory compliance company that provides exhaustive customer service and support during every stage of the solution’s implementation and continued operation. They should be accessible to address inquiries, resolve issues, and offer ongoing assistance as your compliance requirements evolve.
Seamless Integration and Implementation
The transition to a new compliance solution should be frictionless. Consult with the regulatory compliance company regarding their implementation process and verify that they have a track record of seamless integration with existing systems. This minimises the disruption to your daily operations and enables your team to rapidly become familiar with the new platform.
Reputation and Past Performance
Collaborating with an industry-leading regulatory compliance company is essential. Look for case studies that highlight their prior accomplishments, industry recognition, and client testimonials. This track record reassures you that your company is trustworthy.
Beyond Reporting: Embracing the Benefits of a Quality Compliance Partner
Selecting a top-notch regulatory compliance system entails more than just automating report generation. It uncovers a plethora of advantages that can substantially improve the overall health and profitability of your institution.
- By identifying and addressing potential compliance gaps prior to their development into significant issues, a robust compliance system can prevent regulatory penalties and reputational injury.
- Automation streamlines data collection, aggregation, and reporting, thereby freeing up valuable staff resources and enhancing operational efficiency.
- The automated workflows of the compliance solution ensure the reliability and accuracy of compliance data by reducing human error and inconsistencies in data collection and reporting.
- Proactive risk management and strategic decision-making are facilitated by advanced analytics tools, which offer insights into compliance status.
- The implementation of the ideal compliance solutions can mitigate the costs associated with regulatory penalties, error remediation, and manual processes.
- Organisation can establish trust with regulators, clients, and investors, resulting in a competitive advantage.
SCV & CRS Regulatory Reporting: A Spotlight on Integrated Solutions
Financial institutions face complex regulatory reporting challenges, particularly in FSCS Single Customer View (SCV) and Common Reporting Standard (CRS) reporting. Comprehensive SCV suites provide a holistic view of each customer’s holdings, simplifying the FSCS SCV reporting process and empowering internal teams.
Similarly, CRS reporting streamlines international tax compliance by identifying relevant accounts, gathering information, and generating reports in standardised formats for multiple countries.
Integrated solutions create a centralised hub for managing regulatory reporting needs, eliminating the need for multiple systems and manual data transfer. This approach provides valuable insights, reduces costs, and allows for future-proofing compliance strategies.
By choosing a regulatory compliance partner offering integrated solutions for FSCS SCV and CRS reporting, financial institutions can streamline regulatory reporting processes, meet compliance obligations, and enhance their overall compliance posture, fostering trust and confidence with regulators and clients.
Macro Global: Your Partner in Achieving Compliance Excellence
Macro Global, the right regulatory compliance company, stands out as a top choice for regulatory compliance solutions, especially with its flagship products SCV Forza, SCV Alliance, and CRS Stride. These products offer a unique set of features and a competitive edge that make Macro Global the preferred partner for financial institutions seeking to enhance their regulatory reporting capabilities.
FSCS SCV Suite
SCV Forza and SCV Alliance by Macro Global are advanced solutions that provide banks with a comprehensive platform for fulfilling their regulatory obligations efficiently and accurately. These products offer end-to-end automation, electronic FSCS output, and value-added services like data cleansing and enrichment, ensuring banks can meet their FSCS regulatory reporting requirements seamlessly.
CRS Stride
CRS Stride, another key product from Macro Global, is a robust solution for automating HMRC CRS & FATCA reporting obligations with ease and accuracy. This platform saves processing time, ensures data accuracy right from the start, and provides rigorous audit checkpoints to classify risks effectively. Additionally, it offers features like automated self-certification, adhoc support, and real-time regulatory tracking, making it a standout solution in the market.
Unlocking the Secrets of Successful Compliance
Macro Global’s products, including SCV Forza, SCV Alliance, and CRS Stride, offer several competitive advantages that set them apart in the regulatory compliance landscape. These include:
- Comprehensive Compliance Approach: Solutions developed by compliance professionals with extensive expertise to meet specific financial institution needs.
- Proactive Regulatory Tracking: Platforms updated periodically to keep pace with regulatory requirements.
- Role-Based User Access Control: Configurable controls for access to necessary information and functionalities.
- Data Management and Audit: Solutions consolidate and categorise data sets, improving reporting accuracy.
- Data Security and Compliance: Ensures full compliance with data protection regulations and industry best practices.
- Extensive Support and Assistance: Advanced support for void submissions, compliance advisory, and assurance validation.
- Future-Proof Solutions: Hosted on Microsoft Azure Cloud for strong data security and governance.
In conclusion, Macro Global’s SCV Forza, SCV Alliance, and CRS Stride products offer a combination of cutting-edge features, proactive regulatory tracking, robust data management, and comprehensive support, making them the ideal choice for banks and financial institutions looking to streamline their regulatory compliance processes and ensure accuracy and efficiency in regulatory reporting
Ready to Unlock the Power of Regulatory Compliance?
Contact Macro Global today and experience the difference. Let’s transform compliance from a burden to a competitive advantage.
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Top 14 Common FATCA/ CRS Reporting Issues & Solutions
Meeting the constantly evolving regulatory requirements of the tax authorities presents a significant problem for financial institutions. The need for tax returns has surged among many banks’ clientele who have assets everywhere. The number of transactions is rising, new guidance is being released often, and it is getting harder to comply with standards, which further adds to the difficulty of the situation.
Here are MG’s view on the most common reporting standard errors identified by STEP that occur during the CRS reporting process. Let's deep dive into each of them.
- The financial institution (FI) must re-register, and it is unable to access previous returns on the portal since its login information has changed due to employee turnover. Login information for the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) portal should be kept private and shared only with those who require it. The financial institution should ensure that there is a reliable method of maintaining access to its portal. A phoney email account could be a good alternative if the FI has robust security and data protection safeguards in place.
- The FI has the wrong idea of what an undocumented account is. HMRC has told FIs that they are wrongly reporting accounts as “undocumented” when an account holder has not filled out a self-certification that was asked of them. This has caused a lot of accounts to be reported with the wrong country code for GB residents. This is only applicable to Pre-Existing Individual accounts and not applicable to entities and New Individual accounts.Undocumented lower-value accounts only exist if all three of the following criteria are met:
- The Financial Institution’s only signals from their electronic record search are a “hold mail” instruction or an “in-care-of” address in a CRS Reportable Jurisdiction.
- There is no other address or indicia of residency for the Account Holder.
- The financial institution has, in the sequence that best suits the situation:
- attempted to get a self-certification or other documented evidence from the Account Holder to demonstrate the jurisdiction of tax residence of the Account Holder but was unsuccessful in doing so; or
- conducted a paper record search for indicia but no indicia were located.
- Only a “hold mail” instruction or an “in-care-of” address in a CRS Reportable Jurisdiction are the only signs that the Financial Institution has from their paper record search and electronic record search.
- There is no additional address or indication of residency for the Account Holder.
- To determine the Account Holder’s jurisdiction of tax residence, the Financial Institution has attempted to get a self-certification or other documentary evidence from the Account Holder but has been unsuccessful.
- The FIs submit using the XML schema. The submission is turned down because MessageRef, FIReturnRef, and AccountRef were used in the wrong way.HMRC published Schema and supporting documents for software developers who use the AEOI service. The schema guidance tells you everything you need to know about how to use references. You can find it here.Our CRS Stride populates the XML schema which contains the above-said parameters.
- The FI reports accounts for which the account holder does not live in a jurisdiction are subject to reporting.It is not appropriate to report people who do not reside in a reportable jurisdiction. Some jurisdictions that have signed up for CRS are not yet prepared to receive exchanges, while some of those that have signed up are not reciprocal. It is important to note that the reportable jurisdictions are updated frequently, and the notification will be given by HMRC. Refer to IEIM402340.Our CRS FATCA tax consultants follow the HMRC updates on the jurisdictions and add or remove the jurisdiction in the CRS Stride solution for effective CRS/FATCA reporting.
- Although the resident country code is not the US, the FI reports accounts as NPFFIs.Concerning years up to 2016, the phrase “non-participating foreign financial institution” (NPFFI) solely applies to FATCA and is not relevant to CRS. The resident country code, if applicable, should be US.Our CRS Stride can identify and segregate the NPFFIs in the exclusive audit reports we generate.
- The FI reports accounts that are not reportable because they are excluded, such as registered pension plans.IEIM 401720 provides a detailed definition of undesignated and designated accounts.Undesignated accounts: When a financial account (owned by a non-financial intermediary, such as a solicitor) is a pooled account that holds the funds of underlying clients of the non-financial intermediary and does not meet the requirements of IEIM401860, where:
- If the non-financial intermediary is the only person listed or identified on the financial account with the financial institution, and
- If the non-financial intermediary is not required to disclose or pass on their underlying client or clients’ information to the financial institution to comply with AML/KYC requirements or other regulatory requirements, then, provided both of these conditions are met, the financial institution is only required to carry out the due diligence procedures concerning the financial account.
- The FI reports non-individuals who should not be reported.Governmental organisations, international organisations, central banks, and financial institutions are not reportable account holders under CRS, nor are firms with regularly traded stock and similar entities. Article 1 (gg) of the UK-US Intergovernmental Agreement contains a list of exceptions to the phrase “specified US person” as used in FATCA (IGA).
- The FI submitted the CRS XML which does not adhere to XML schema definitions (XSD) published by HMRC.An XML schema definition (XSD) is a framework document that defines the rules and constraints for XML documents. The generated CRS XML must fully adhere to the rules of the XSD document published by the HMRC.
- The Entity’s account holder type is set as Reportable Entity with Controlling Person, but controlling person(s) is not provided in the XML.If the account holder type is set as “Reportable Entity with Controlling Person” then at least one controlling person must be provided for the entity.
- The entity must be reportable even though the entity’s jurisdiction is not reportable and any one of the controlling persons is in reportable jurisdictions.As per the HMRC guidelines, if any one of the controlling person’s jurisdictions is reportable and belongs to the particular entity, then entity details are also reportable.
- TIN (Tax Identification Number) is not provided for the US customer.As per the HMRC guidelines, the TIN for US Tax residence is mandatory. If the customer does not provide the TIN, then the default TIN value of nine-zero must be populated. If possible FIs can populate the TIN values provided in the link instead if nine-zero.
- Void Submission File generation to delete the submitted CRS file from the HMRC portal.If FIs identified an issue in the previously submitted CRS file, then void submission XML file needs to be generated which should adhere to XML Schema and Specification given by HMRC.
- Only financial institutions are permitted to use the AEOI enquiry helpline.HMRC requires that you refrain from providing your account holders with information about the AEOI enquiry lines. This overwhelms its AEOI filing crew and makes it unable to help FIs with their reporting requirements.
- The FI waits until the last minute to file.When submissions are made far in advance of the deadline of May 31, every year, FIs have more opportunity to address any unforeseen problems, such as missing data or incorrect XML structure, which could result in the application being denied.
Click here to learn how MG’s “CRS Stride” can satisfy your need for an optimal CRS solution. Our product and services cover all aspects of your CRS reporting obligation, but you can cancel at any time.
A look at how SME banks are adapting to the Common Reporting Standard Shifts
When it comes to data management in HMRC CRS reporting processes, SME banks faces number of compliance hurdles. To be fully compliant with HMRC, AEOI/OECD standards, banks must also ensure they have adequate controls and data management in place.
There is a level of basic information required of customers that can easily be obtained in the onboarding process are required for the CRS reporting. Our blog “Key Practical Aspects of OECD Common Reporting Standard (CRS)” explains the data requirements for the CRS reporting, OECD standards and its implications to the financial institutions.
Many SME banks offer a range of products and services, making it more challenging to determine which accounts should be subject to CRS reporting. All financial accounts which meet specific criteria must be reported in line with CRS. In addition, Banks must also report any account held by a company or trust under CRS guidelines. This means that the new rules could impact a wide range of financial products – from savings accounts to investment funds.
SME banks in particular typically have fewer compliance resources available to devote to implementation, and they may also struggle to identify all their customers who meet the reporting criteria. Banks started educating their staff on how to accurately confirm and report on a client’s identity and entity information.
The problem for growing SME-facing financial institutions is how to do these at scale with complete accuracy. As banks scale their products and services, they are continuously changing their procedures and systems to comply with CRS, requiring a data-led approach to make reporting easier. Proper systems and procedures should be put in place to identify and report any such activity and verify the identity of their clients.
Banks must take a holistic approach to CRS compliance and seek expert solutions to avoid rising compliance costs and significant fines. While training for bank staff is essential, an automated software solution will ensure smooth and compliant implementation of CRS reporting. Implementing CRS reporting software rather than relying on compliance staff to manually onboard customers is becoming increasingly essential.
CRS compliance and the impact on the client experience
The implementation of CRS will significantly impact the relationship between banks and their clients. Banks must take the necessary steps to ensure compliance but without creating a lengthy, manual customer experience.
The simple solution is automation. Capturing structured data in the onboarding journey and automatically storing data in line with HMRC CRS reporting requirements can significantly reduce onboarding time and in-life review processes. With CRS Stride banks are able to save up to 85% of their typical processing time.
Compliance can be a complex process, and banks must communicate openly with their clients about what is required of them. Embedding an end-to-end reporting solution in the customer journey will reduce duplication of entry for clients while ensuring data integrity and automated reporting workflows for compliance teams.
Key considerations by SMEs in implementing a best practice approach to CRS Compliance
There are several key considerations when implementing a best practice approach to CRS compliance. Firstly, SME banks should seek expert help to get up to speed with the new rules. If they are to build an in-house solution, it must be constantly managed to keep in line with changing regulatory requirements and to ensure controls hold up to audit standards.
Secondly, comprehensive data analysis is essential to identify all customers who meet the reporting criteria. Financial institutions must accurately report this data to HMRC. Banks must put in place systems and procedures to ensure compliance with CRS on an ongoing basis. Without an automated CRS reporting solution, this will rely heavily on training staff and manual review of potential suspicious activity.
Implementing a best practice approach to CRS compliance can be a challenge for SME banks. However, it is essential to avoid any penalties or reputational damage. By implementing expert solutions to provide comprehensive data analysis and put robust systems and procedures in place, SME banks can ensure compliance with new and changing regulations.
Final thoughts
Complying with CRS reporting standards is a complex challenge for SME banks. Obtaining the relevant data can be straightforward on a smaller scale, but manual compliance comes at the cost of longer processing times and a poor customer experience. As banks look to scale, data management should be integral to any strategic decision making. Software solutions are critical to accurate reporting and allow much greater flexibility as they grow their products, services and markets.
SME banks that take this best practice approach to CRS compliance can reap several benefits, including a reduced risk of penalties, improved reputation and a smoother relationship with HMRC.
FATCA / CRS Reporting 2023 – Deadlines, Updates & Challenges
The shift in financial and economic conditions all over the world requires stringent regulatory scrutiny. Regulators demand financial institutions to improve transparency in their reportable accounts and tax revenues.
As you are aware, after decades of discussion and dialogue finally in 2014, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) introduced CRS as a global legal framework for Automatic Exchange Of Information(AEOI) between multiple jurisdictions to promote tax transparency and prevent offshore tax evasion. OECD directs the participating jurisdictions to obtain information from the Financial Institutions on the financial accounts held by the non-residents. This information will then be exchanged annually among the relevant jurisdictions. So far 115 jurisdictions around the globe have adopted CRS to maintain the integrity of the tax systems by combating offshore bank secrecy.
Every financial institution is scrambling to get over the line of HMRC CRS deadline every year around April and May. Nevertheless, on the regulatory reporting front, authorities are more stubborn on respective deadlines & Reporting accuracies, hence enterprises are shifting to digital automation at a faster pace never to be “battlefield ready” with a good flood-defence system. It’s more strategical rather than a routine regular exercise.
CRS reporting landscape constantly demands increased dynamics of changes including the following
- Reporting jurisdiction addition/drop from AEOI regime.
- Sustained demand from HMRC on correct account classification & reporting.
- Continuous impact on onboarding platforms to capture extended and precise tax declaration and ongoing maintenance and review.
- Periodical review & ongoing centralised record maintenance on Self Certification.
- Platform to support HMRC queries and submit a revised variation.
- Platform to support Remediation, Cleansing & Data Enrichment using single customer view data.
Lets start discussing the above said changes and the challenges around the CRS reporting and what banks and other financial institutions should do to be proactive with an effective plan to manage the CRS FATCA regulatory obligations seamlessly.
What are the challenges faced by the financial institutions in CRS reporting?
Data quality is one of the main challenges in any regulatory reporting as the legacy technologies or the manual operational approach results in data inaccuracies, data gaps, inconsistent taxonomies & consolidation of entities that affects the accuracy of the CRS reporting and increase the operational risk.
Further, as the new compliance processes require more granularity around the reportable data, FIs with their legacy operational approach find it hard to produce data that is fully compliant with HMRC FATCA & CRS reporting guidelines.
Achieving the regulatory compliance mandate is time-dependent and involves operational risk due to manual data scrubbing. Manual validation causes are results in error-prone and require additional investigation from the Regulator prompting questions and enquiries over the operational efficiency of the business and the data which lead to reputational risk.
What do the financial institutions need to do?
As you are aware that the deadline for HMRC CRS/FATCA reporting for 2023 is 31st of May, it is the right time for financial institutions to initiate the gap study and analysis on your CRS data and reports at the earliest so that you will be fully geared up along with effective data governance framework for this year CRS reporting on time.
Financial Institutions need to foster collaboration between various teams such as Operations, IT, Legal, and Taxation that ensures comprehensive and hassle-free compliance to robust regulations. Financial institutions should revisit their existing KYC/AML and client onboarding procedures with an exhaustive due diligence procedure to segregate and categorise the CRS reportable accounts. It requires a robust framework, domain expertise, a unified solution, etc to handle the ever-evolving CRS requirements, address the challenges and be prepared for the reporting obligation now as well as future.
Macro Global offers ”Fully-Automated, Future-Proof, Cloud/On-Prem/Hybrid” platform CRS Stride – AEOI / HMRC CRS & FATCA Reporting Solution that is unique and flexible comprising both Audit & Automation processes as a single integrated platform crafted with all our experience & expertise learnt over years.
With our futureproof “CRS Reporting Solution”, financial institutions would be better placed to furnish the precise CRS data in line with the HMRC CRS specifications.
We take care of your CRS reporting obligations in its entirety and assist you not during the deadline but prepare you before and after the submission. You have one less thing to worry about and fully confident that your compliance adherence completely addressed throughout with an assurance validation by our tax and subject matter experts. You could save substantial cost and effort by your compliance team to prepare and submit CRS report without worrying endless technical challenges around the submission, remediation & managing variation and finally “Assurance Certification”.
One great reason to choose us is the product maturity as it’s already tried and tested with every small detail addressed leaving you to focus on your business than burning midnight oil to tackle endless queries from HMRC.
If this sounds like something you are keen, pls drop a note to our sales team at salesdesk@macroglobal.co.uk or call us at +44 0204 574 2433 to book a demo or for a free no-obligation product trial.
More with us
Try Macro Global's
CRS Stride - HMRC CRS & FATCA Reporting Solution
FATCA: Objective, Impacts & Challenges in Financial Institutions
In 2010, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) is introduced in the United States to ensure that citizens fully disclose their worldwide income to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) is a piece of US legislation aimed at preventing and detecting offshore tax evasion by US citizens (US citizens, US tax residents or US legal entities). FATCA became effective on July 1, 2014.
Foreign governments across the world have agreed to comply with the regulations and have signed FATCA into local law by establishing bilateral agreements known as Inter-Governmental Agreements with the US (IGA).
What is the objective of FATCA?
FATCA was enacted to impose a reporting burden on monetary payers to protect the US tax base. It enables the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to view information about offshore accounts held directly or indirectly by US citizens in cases where tax evasion is suspected.
Foreign financial institutions (FFIs) must identify their financial account holders and then report to the IRS the details of reportable US account holders and their accounts. This is typically done indirectly through the FFI’s local tax authority such as HMRC (for the UK), and it is dependent on the IGA in place.
The IRS compares FFI data to what private individuals and legal entities report on their tax returns. Before FATCA, the IRS could not make this comparison and had to rely on taxpayers to be forthcoming.
UK-US intergovernmental agreement (IGA)
The important point is that the legislation is now part of UK law because of the UK-US intergovernmental agreement (IGA) and the regulations issued under section 222 of the Finance Act 2013. Default has financial and reputational ramifications.
All UK entities are subject to UK rules, and solicitors may be asked for their clients’ FATCA status when dealing with other institutions such as banks and stockbrokers, in addition to the standard AML and client identification procedures.
Every year, financial institutions must evaluate their accounts and report certain account holders to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). This includes data required to be sent to the United States under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).
Who are the reportable persons under FATCA?
The legislation requires Financial Institutions (FIs) (banks, stockbrokers, and other financial intermediaries, including most Trusts) to notify the IRS through HMRC when any amounts are paid to or for a US person, irrespective of where the payment is made. Furthermore, the IRS must be confident that the FI has adequate systems in place to identify and record US Persons. The FI will be in default if there is a failure to report or any other non-compliance with the FATCA regime.
Individuals who are US citizens, US tax residents, or US legal entities are FATCA reportable persons.
- Private individuals born in one of the states of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (born on or after November 4, 1986), or the Virgin Islands.
- Foreign-born children under the age of 18, residing in the United States with their birth or adoptive parents, at least one of whom is a US citizen by birth or naturalisation.
- Individuals who have been granted citizenship by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) (naturalised US citizens).
US residents such as Citizens of the United States of America, Green Card holders. Persons who spend a significant amount of time in the United States, regardless of citizenship, or those who choose to be treated as a US resident for a portion of the year.
US legal entities include US domestic corporations, companies, partnerships, and trusts that are organised under US law. The federal government of the United States, as well as its agencies and states.
What financial institutions should do for FATCA reporting?
Customer Identification: According to this IGA agreement, Financial Institutions are responsible for identifying and reporting Financial Accounts held by Specified US Persons. Customer Identification can be done in three ways:
- Indicia search – The Financial Institution can identify Reportable Accounts by searching for US indicia by referring to documentation or information held or collected in connection with the maintenance or opening of an account; this may include information held for the purposes of complying with UK AML/KYC rules.
- Self-certification – obtained from an account holder or Controlling Person.
- Publicly available information (for entities only) – Using publicly available information, a Financial Institution may be able to determine the FATCA status of an entity account holder.
Reporting: According to HMRC guidelines, banks must report all financial account information held explicitly or implicitly by US reportable customers to HMRC. The information will then be forwarded to the US Internal Revenue Service by HMRC.
Withholding: FATCA requires Foreign Financial Institutions (FFIs) outside the United States (US) to provide information about their US customers to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Anyone who fails to comply is subject to a 30% withholding tax.
Key Challenges faced by financial institutions in FATCA reporting
Need for detailed guidance on Self-certification forms
Self-certification is likely to be the preferable option for most financial services firms, which will shift as much of the compliance burden as possible to clients. Clients will seek advice from the financial institutions with which they do business. However, the lack of detailed guidance and the absence of case law means that financial institutions will be hesitant to provide advice for fear of being sued and facing non-compliance issues.
Adherence to OECD guidelines
FATCA and UK tax obligations are already difficult. The OECD’s Common Reporting Standards add to the confusion. The OECD standards are merely guidelines for the 40+ countries that have agreed to them. Each country will be free to implement these standards in the way that best suits them. This could lead to inconsistencies and place a significant burden on businesses. FATCA forms are already lengthy and complicated. Customers are requested to fill out forms for other jurisdictions. It will be tedious for the financial institutions to ensure complete compliance with multiple jurisdictional and disparate requirements.
Lengthy & Tedious Client onboarding process
Banks must educate their customers about the importance of adhering to compliance requirements while onboarding them. Financial services firms’ due diligence requirements with respect to compliance obligations also result in significantly longer onboarding times. Hence banks should implement a digital customer onboarding process. Digital Customer Onboarding improves the customer experience and makes the process smoother or even effortless.
Need for Centralised Data sourceTo have a single view of their customer across all parts of the business, financial institutions will need a centralised customer database and some data processing capability. To pull this data from disparate systems, new technology such as FSCS SCV Enterprise Solution Suite will be required.
Lack of Ongoing Compliance Process
Foreign financial institutions must identify where their customers’ income is earned and sourced. This exercise is carried out every quarter. Financial institutions also have to identify any incoming funds that may be subjected to withholding tax, in which case, systems will need to calculate the appropriate tax to be withheld. Robust processes are to be established to fulfil the above said regulatory obligations and to ensure a higher degree of compliance.
Shortage of Compliance Knowledge
Generally, there is a lack of understanding of the full scope of FATCA requirements and implications at all levels of the organisation. For the reasons stated above, front office staff of the banks should be more cautious in giving advice to their customers. Senior executives must be aware of the implications for them. Specialised training programs should be given to front office staff to de-risk non-compliance. Customers must also be made aware of the FATCA compliance requirements. It must also be refined on a regular basis to ensure it remains effective.
Need for well-structured Documentation & Data
Every stage of client onboarding and ongoing client interaction must be diligently documented to ensure a comprehensive audit trail and proof in the event of regulatory scrutiny. Additional circumstantial data and documentation will need to be collected and stored so that evidence can be framed under the circumstances at the time of audit investigation or regulatory scrutiny drills.
Documentation is one of the most significant challenges for most financial services organisations, necessitating a comprehensive change programme to ensure that everyone in the organisation understands the importance of documentation and does it consistently. Major banks are using our Aira – Enterprise Document & Workflow Management System, which enhances the productivity and efficiency of their business operations to the next level of profitable growth.
Oversight & Senior Management Assurance
The Board members will be held individually and collectively liable for any FATCA compliance violations. They will require regular assurance that everything is in order. This will necessitate new governance and oversight processes, as well as an efficient and timely process for escalation of any regulatory violation. The Board will have to rely heavily on their senior directors to ensure compliance. Many boards will be sceptical and will require formal attestations from business leaders.
Who Is Responsible for FATCA Compliance?
Even though it appears to be a simple enough task, where do FATCA and other tax reporting compliance fit into the organisation? The larger multinational financial institutions appear to be struggling to answer these questions. Does FATCA come under the scope of the KYC team, the Tax Team, or Risk and Compliance? Is it a centralised team or a hub-and-spoke structure? The requirement for a single view of the client precludes a purely federated model in which individual businesses are responsible for their own FATCA compliance. What should the governance process look like once a stakeholder is identified? Should the firm have its FATCA/Tax Reporting monitoring role? Is it required to Outsource, Build or Buy an effective FATCA reporting software to seamlessly achieve the expected CRS Compliance mandated by HMRC with critical strategic crossroads?
With decades of technical experience and subject matter expertise in the regulatory space, Macro Global provides financial institutions with the assurance that their CRS reporting activities are handled by a cutting-edge CRS & FATCA Reporting Solution. We have a sophisticated audit tool that will pinpoint all the shortcomings in the CRS data automatically based on the predefined rules rather than manually going one by one. This would save us considerable time and redundancy on either side.
Automate your HMRC CRS & FATCA reporting obligations with ease, Utmost accuracy and stress free.
CRS Stride - AEOI / HMRC CRS & FATCA Reporting Solution
Early Adopters and Late Followers – Lessons learnt from their CRS Reporting experience
Early adopters of the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) are evidence that the implementation of CRS compliance comes with challenges. Adopting CRS compliance is time-consuming as a lot of preparatory work is to be done. Financial institutions should adhere to local regulations when classifying and reporting reportable accounts.
Challenges faced by Early Adopters of CRS/FATCA Reporting
Misinterpretation of FATCA & CRS
FATCA and CRS are still being misunderstood and interpreted as two separate pieces of legislation, according to CRS early adopters. Many institutions claim they are FATCA compliant, so they don’t need to be compliant with CRS or they have the same information. These two schemes differ significantly.
Although there are common themes between CRS and FATCA, it is vital to understand that they are not the same, and each has its own set of penalties and requirements. CRS jurisdictions may have their country-specific reporting styles and gateways, whereas FATCA is only for US citizens, whereas CRS is much broad in scope and based on residency.
Late adopters should plan ahead of time to ensure that staff who are already comfortable with FATCA can learn the new CRS requirements. Depending on the circumstances, Financial institutions and entities may be required to file both FATCA and CRS reports in each jurisdiction. In the nutshell, more tasks are to be done for CRS reporting compared to FATCA reporting.
CRS reporting is pretended to be a more complex and unsolidified reporting proposition than FATCA because of the increased volume of reportable accounts to the broader range of tax authorities involved and the limited time to implement the regulatory changes. Thus the challenge to keep up with its requirements is that much greater.
Penalties for non-compliance
Penalties for non-compliance may vary for each jurisdiction. Non-compliance can spoil a company’s reputation and cause customers to lose trust. Global exchange and access to information raise the reputational risks of companies and financial institutions failing to comply, as information become public way quicker than ever before spread globally from day one.
Banks in multiple geo-locations
Early adopters of CRS learned that there is a degree of nuance in which organisations are obligated to report. The massive magnitude of the CRS adds complexity for banking institutions that operates from multiple geo-locations whose clients are spread all over the world.
Exploring multiple tax jurisdictions, handling massively more data reporting volumes than FATCA, and adhering to a relatively high number of data validation rules are just a few of these barriers.
Siloed data are the slippery side of compliance
The legacy reporting systems that support the compliance team in regulatory reporting preparation by pulling data from multiple sources to cobble together an excel report that is prone to errors, omissions, and duplication are the bank’s business challenge. Even though the systems are designed for operational drives and objectives, the data contained within the core system in some shape or form that does not fully comply with regulatory reporting with significant data silos.
The reality is that organisations are frequently confronted with multiple systems that do not communicate with one another, as well as multiple data feeds in various formats, resulting in duplication issues. The massive volume of unstructured data presents a new challenge for compliance teams, as it is difficult to derive accurate data and perform data unification with multiple records for the same person.
With increasing pressure from regulators to achieve high-quality standards and a plethora of emerging regulations in both the prudential risk and business conduct arenas, the financial institutions aspired to streamline the existing regulatory reporting process, which was not standardised, and improve the data quality.
Absence of Solid Data Governance Framework
As organisations have customer data distributed across systems, with multiple database technologies, and different and inconsistent formats, financial institutions have been fighting the battle of poorly integrated customer data.
Various implementation approaches to ensure data consistency across platforms in the past have ranged from enforcing strict policies and the approaches have all failed in the face of increasingly distributed information, inadequate middleware infrastructure, and increased operational costs.
Key takeaways for the Late adopters from the Early adopters
Financial institutions are finding it difficult to manage the existing slew of new and impending rules and regulations, forcing them to develop a more consistent and comprehensive view of all the entities with which they do business. Banks should operate with the intense knowledge that more changes are inevitable and that the timeframe for implementing their own CRS reporting functionalities is now extremely short.
Data integrity has often been a daunting task because organisations can’t analyze until they’ve done the integration, and they can’t do the integration until they’ve done the cleansing, deduping, matching, and enriching. The accuracy of matching customer accounts must be significantly improved, and this process can be hampered if the base name and address data are of poor quality.
As a result, a thorough data cleansing and enrichment process are required in advance. The desire to maintain consistent and high-quality data was a top priority for every financial institution, and it was viewed as a competitive advantage. The use of automated validation routines is one approach to achieving the framework that they should be able to see a cohesive, accurate record of the customer’s details across systems.
The first step for entities looking to implement smooth and efficient classification and reporting is to contact a service provider and discuss applicable requirements. Each entity will have distinct requirements.
There will be difficulties, so stay informed…
Today’s critical business development issue is strategic in both the short and long term, and it must be resolved in accordance with the organization’s strategy. They are usually intertwined with an organisational structure or a business process. The current and future tightness that exists between the tactical and planned approaches should not be a source of concern for business. Both must be represented in a strategic plan while remaining realistic in addressing the business’s immediate needs.
A good strategic plan forces everyone out of their comfort zones, methodically challenges their assumptions, and employs an unbiased approach to find the best strategy that supports the organization’s mission and objectives, as well as desired outcomes and metrics for measuring the goals. In most cases and key challenges, identifying and concentrating on business development issues is the best course of action.
Observing the difficulties that SME banks face in re-engineering their operational processes and keeping up with the trends in the regulatory landscape expansion, Macro Global saw an opportunity to provide a compliance platform to assist SME banks in processing reporting requirements with greater agility.
CRS Stride addresses the challenges of efficient regulatory change compliance management through intuitive integration of impacted controls and processes mandated for CRS reporting. Our cloud-based solution is intended to meet CRS compliance obligations in the most cost-effective manner possible, thereby reducing operational impediments. CRS Stride simplifies and lowers the cost of compliance by automating the reporting process and effectively managing data issues via our optimised business rule engine. Data issues are thrown back for easy correction after being validated against the HMRC reporting criteria.
CRS Stride consolidates, validates, and enriches data in real-time, improving data integrity and reporting accuracy. Our solution enables financial institutions to easily unlock value and manage regulatory compliance, allowing them to focus on their core business rather than going around in circles.
If you require advice from our expert team, who understands your industry better than our competitors? If you’re curious about how we transformed businesses by leveraging our unrivalled industry and domain expertise, read on.
Automate your HMRC CRS & FATCA reporting obligations with ease, Utmost accuracy and stress free.
CRS Stride - AEOI / HMRC CRS & FATCA Reporting Solution
Key Practical Aspects of OECD Common Reporting Standard (CRS)
The Common Reporting Standard (CRS), developed in response to a G20 request and approved by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Council on 15 July 2014 as a global standard for the Automatic Exchange Of Information (AEOI), requires jurisdictions to obtain information from their financial institutions and exchange that information automatically with other jurisdictions on an annual basis.
The Standard is made up of four major components:
- A model Competent Authority Agreement (CAA) establishes the international legal framework for the automatic exchange of CRS information
- The Common Reporting Standard (CRS)
- Commentaries on the CAA and CRS
- The User Guide for the CRS XML Schema
It applies to all countries that have signed on to the CRS and incorporated it into their domestic legislation. Over a hundred countries have signed on so far, and the list is still growing. As of October 2021, over 4500 bilateral exchange relationships had been activated concerning more than 110 CRS-committed jurisdictions, The list of countries participating in the CRS is available at http://www.oecd.org/tax/automatic-exchange/commitment-and-monitoring-process.
The OECD lists forty-plus “developing” countries that have not yet signed on to CRS. With 196 sovereign countries and non-sovereign territories (such as Anguilla or the Cayman Islands), there are a few jurisdictions that aren’t on either list.
CRS requires Financial Institutions (FIs) located in a CRS-compliant country to identify non-resident clients and report them to their local tax administrations in a CRS-compliant country.
It specifies that financial institutions must report the various types of accounts and taxpayers covered, and the common due diligence procedures that financial institutions must follow. Financial institutions will be required to provide HMRC with information on anyone who owns foreign investments and appears to be a UK resident, such as by having a UK postal address. Certain clients will be required to be notified by financial institutions and certain relevant persons, including professional businesses providing tax advice.
The implementation of automatic information exchange is based on the following actions:
- Account-holders who must declare their tax residence to determine whether or not they are considered “non-residents” via self-certification in the following cases:
- for any new account or subscription of CRS-eligible products for an existing client, provided that this client does not already have a valid self-certification
- for any change in circumstances that has a tax impact.
- Financial institutions that must report annually to their local tax authority on “non-resident” clients’ account balances and financial income paid to them during the year
- The tax authorities of the participating countries should share this information with the tax authorities of the account holders who are the subject of this declaration for tax purposes.
Account holders who didn’t provide the CRS-required information will be reported “undocumented” by their regional tax authorities and will face legal consequences as per local law.
The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and its Implications for the Financial Services Industry
Financial Institutions must report their income and expenditures to their jurisdiction’s governing body under the CRS, but there are some exceptions. Financial Institutions are defined by the CRS as:
- Custodial Institutions
- Banks
- Asset/Wealth Managers
- Investment Trades
- Investment Entities
- Depository Institutions
What are the challenges faced by the financial institutions in CRS reporting?
Achieving the regulatory compliance mandate is time-dependent and involves operational risk due to manual data scrubbing. Manual validation causes are results in error-prone and require additional investigation from the Regulator prompting questions and enquiries over the operational efficiency of the business and the data which lead to reputational risk.
Further, as the new compliance processes require more granularity around the reportable data, FIs with their legacy operational approach find it hard to produce data that is fully compliant with HMRC FATCA & CRS reporting guidelines.
Identification and Classification of the Reportable Accounts
The existing customer onboarding process involves manual interaction and the data received from the customer during this onboarding process may not be adequate to identify and classify the CRS reportable accounts. Hence the banks and financial institutions must perform exhaustive data cleaning processes to make their customer data fully compliant with HMRC CRS guidelines, which is a time-consuming and tedious process.
Impact on Data Quality due Data Silos
Data quality is one of the main challenges in any regulatory reporting as the legacy technologies or the manual operational approach results in data inaccuracies, data gaps, inconsistent taxonomies & consolidation of entities that affects the accuracy of the CRS reporting and increase the operational risk. Multiple systems are to be integrated to collate and aggregate the data that is required for CRS reporting which is a challenging and complex task considering the IT architecture and the scalability of the financial institutions. Implementing a solid FATCA/CRS solution can save your life.
Compliant to HMRC CRS Reporting Schema
Reportable banks and financial institutions must have improved systems in place to monitor and assess capital-market transactions for potential withholding and reporting. This demands the deployment of a relevant reporting schema to capture additional data, which is a difficult task that requires a comprehensive understanding of CRS & FATCA requirements and the related taxonomy.
Inadequate operational efficiency
Typically, data is distributed across variety of products and geographical data sources. It is critical to synchronise data from various departments to make the necessary decisions concerning account holders. Only a few institutions accomplish error-free reporting by adopting effective FATCA/CRS solutions that address the issue.
Short deadlines and a lack of trained resources
FATCA/CRS regulatory reporting is a comprehensive regulation. Because of the critical tasks and strict deadlines for report submission, employees of reportable institutions may not have complete knowledge of these ever-changing regulations. As a result, banks and financial institutions may seek an external solution to assist in interpreting the regulation and identifying its impact on the business process to file the report on time and without error.
New Amendments in CRS
In 2017, the OECD published a new guidance called “Mandatory Disclosure Rules” for Combating CRS Avoidance Arrangements and Offshore Procedures. It considered,
- Will the additional reporting obligations reduce cross-border tax evasion?
- Preserving the protections offered by legal professional privilege while shifting the reporting obligation to the taxpayer in cases where arrangements are covered by privilege.
Following this, the OECD issued new Model disclosure rules in March 2018, requiring intermediaries such as lawyers, accountants, financial advisors, banks, and other service providers to notify tax authorities of any schemes they put in place for their clients (as promoters or service providers) to avoid reporting under the CRS or to conceal beneficial owners of offshore entities or trusts.
CRS Regulatory Reporting Requirements
From 2017 onwards, Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories started reporting to their tax authorities.
In the UK, HMRC oversees CRS implementation within each reporting FI located in a country that has recently signed or is planning to sign the CRS soon.
To promote tax transparency, HMRC commits to fulfilling all its CRS obligations following the principles outlined in its Tax Code of Conduct. Below is the key information which should be shared with HRMC:
- Personal identification information, such as name, address, and date of birth;
- Bank account numbers
- End-of-financial-year balances and valuations
- Interest earned
- Earnings from asset sales
The information on remittance basis users will be included in the reports, which is likely to be of particular interest to HMRC.
Individuals with assets in other countries should ensure that their affairs are compliant; if they are, they will have peace of mind. In any case, making a prompted disclosure is preferable to awaiting an HMRC challenge.
Banks are not required to notify their clients that their information may or may not be disclosed to tax authorities in other CRS member countries.
What are major shifts to look out for?
“Tax authorities now have a new and very powerful tool to track and combat tax evasion with the CRS.”
The success of the CRS is determined by how strictly the FIs implement the CRS procedures to procure the correct data which is compliant with OECD guidelines. Its impact will be felt over time once respective governments generate more revenue and tax collection. At the same time, multinational corporations are taking advantage of the CRS to improve their business models and data quality and analytics capabilities.
Internal Procedures and Procedures – Because CRS aims to achieve global tax compliance, it will have an impact on due diligence processes as well as product and entity classification. It will also have an impact on data collection, data quality assessment, and exchange readiness, as well as the implementation of specific reporting procedures. Each jurisdiction will be closely scrutinised to ensure compliance with the law.
Embracing new technologies – Financial institutions are working hard to improve their existing data capture, KYC validation, and due diligence checks while onboarding customers by leveraging innovative technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Behavioural Biometrics, and Machine Learning.
Digital Customer Onboarding – Banks adopt to Digital customer onboarding process. By aggregating the customers’ data and making the process smoother or even effortless, Digital Customer Onboarding improves the customer experience with intuitive navigation. Digital customer onboarding platforms like Pera provides dependable online identification services that assist banks in quickly verifying customer data and thus expediting customer access to banking products and services.
Privacy – CRS requirements must be included in financial institutions’ data protection terms to explain why CRS collects client data.
Final Thoughts
When tax evasion was discovered by authorities in the past, many authorities lacked the resources to prosecute offenders. Today, however, technology is easing the resource burden by allowing governments to more easily review CRS data provided by foreign counterparts and match it to taxpayers in their own countries.
Financial Institutions are proactive and think and act holistically about tax, onboarding, data, and using technology to automate manual processes are at an advantage. More accurate data and information technologies will help governments pinpoint and reduce tax evasion more effectively.
With end-to-end automation features, our cutting-edge CRS & FATCA reporting solution “CRS Stride” provides an outstanding reporting platform that reduces the Common Reporting Standard reporting headaches for any SME banks or financial institutions.
If you would like to find out more about our CRS Stride and try our product for free with no obligations, click here.
References:
https://www.oecd.org/tax/automatic-exchange/common-reporting-standard/
https://www.societegenerale.com/en/societe-generale-group/ethics-and-compliance/common-reporting-standard-csr
More with us
Try Macro Global's
CRS Stride - HMRC CRS & FATCA Reporting Solution
FACTA/CRS Self Certification – What financial institutions should know?
While opening an account with the bank or during the CRS reporting cycle, banks may send a declaration form something in the name of “Tax Residency Self-Certification Declaration form” or “CRS Entity Self-certification form”. This form is being sent to account holders to certify about themselves to identify their tax resident countries and other related information. This form generally contains the Account Holder’s (i) name, (ii) residence address, (iii) jurisdiction(s) of residence for tax purposes, (iv) tax identifying number for each Reportable Jurisdiction, and (v) date of birth.
Financial institutions are directed to collect and report certain information from their account holders (individual or entities) to the tax authorities. This information will help the financial institutions to classify the reportable accounts whether the account holder needs to be reported under CRS or FATCA.
As per HMRC guidelines, any individual who opens an account must provide a self-certification establishing where the individual is tax resident. If the self-certification demonstrates that the Account Holder is a tax resident of a Reportable Jurisdiction, the Reporting Financial Institution must treat the account as a Reportable Account.
For tax residents outside the UK, HMRC will ask the financial institutions to share this self-certification information along with the account details. This information will be shared with respective tax authorities outside the UK by HMRC.
It is the responsibility of the account holder to ensure that the personal information shared by them is correct and up to date. By completing this form, the account holders ensure that they shared accurate and up-to-date information about their tax residency. Unless there is a change in circumstances that impacts the tax resident status or any information submitted in the form becomes erroneous, the CRS form will remain valid. If any of the personal details change, the account holder must notify the financial institutions within 30 days of any change in circumstances that affects their tax residency status or causes the information held to become inaccurate, and the account holder must provide an updated self-certification and declaration within 90 days of such a change.
Participating jurisdictions are expected to provide information to help taxpayers determine their tax residence(s). After obtaining a self-certification, the Reporting Financial Institution must confirm its reasonableness based on the information obtained in connection with the account opening, including any documentation collected according to AML/KYC procedures (the reasonableness test).
If a Reporting Financial Institution does not know or has reason to believe that a self-certification is incorrect or unreliable, it is considered to have confirmed its reasonableness. When a self-certification fails the reasonableness test, the Reporting Financial Institution is required to obtain either a valid self-certification or a reasonable explanation and documentation, as appropriate, supporting the reasonableness of the self-certification.
The Reporting Financial Institutions will always be held accountable for their reporting and due diligence obligations, including confidentiality and data protection obligations.
Each jurisdiction may permit Reporting Financial Institutions to use service providers to meet their reporting and due diligence requirements. Macro Global is one of such technical service providers in the RegTech & FinTech space delivering the best-in-class products to the financial industries. Macro Global has been consistently recognised for its exceptional outcomes and services around Regulatory Reporting for the past 20 years. Macro Global’s CRS Stride, FATCA & Common Reporting Standard solution features a centralised, fully automated Self-Certification module which includes the entire process cycle of classification, customer communication, correction, and consolidation for CRS and FATCA reporting.
CRS Stride generates a filled-in self-certification declaration form in PDF format from the CRS input data as per the HMRC CRS reporting guidelines. Banks can send the filled-in self-certification form to the account holder’s email inbox from the CRS Stride portal itself in just a single click. The account holders have to send the duly signed-in self-certification form back to the bank. This process is made simple as account holders are no longer needed to reach out bank’s customer service for additional information.
MG’s approach in implementing the CRS FATCA reporting solution is crafted to achieve maximum operational efficacy by easing the data management process to ensure data integrity and CRS report accuracy.
In-built Data Correction feature in the CRS Stride reporting solution enables to rectify inaccuracies and redundancies in source data to append/enrich for more complete and accurate reporting on our platform.
Our Tax Experts will do Assurance validation, providing peace of mind that the data is in a good shape with high accuracy and compliance before submitting to HMRC.
CRS Stride – FATCA & CRS Reporting software is available to you from the moment an amendment is published by HMRC to implement control mechanisms and audit-proofing.
Looking for a fully automated CRS FATCA reporting solution? Try CRS Stride today and see how it can power up your CRS FATCA Reporting program!